Finished
Clinical and Economic Comparison of Robot Assisted Versus Manual Knee Replacement
NCT01705886 · Northwest Surgical Specialists, Vancouver · Updated 21 Nov 2024
- What is being tested
- Total Knee Arthroplasty; MAKO® Robot Assisted Medial Knee Arthroplasty; RESTORIS Multicompartmental Knee System; Depuy Knee Replacement System; Stryker® Knee Replacement System
- For
- Knee Arthroplasty
- Kind of study
- Watches patients without assigning a treatment. No drug phase (a device or procedure study).
- Who can join
- Ages 21 years to 80 years. About 62 people. The full rules are on the registry page.
- Where
- United States
- When
- Starts or started Oct 2012, ends Oct 2023. Registered 12 Oct 2012.
- Results
- None posted yet.
In the researchers' words
The purpose of this study is to document and compare the surgical and after surgery costs, recovery time, and outcomes of two procedure types: * Robotic assisted surgery replacing one compartment of the knee * Manual (robot is not used) surgery replacing all three compartments of the knee (total knee replacement) The hypothesis is that robot assisted partial knee replacement is cost effective and provides clinical outcomes that are equivalent to a manual total knee replacement.
Sites
- Rebound Orthopedics and NeurosurgeryVancouver, Washington, United States